AI Assistants: The Annoyance Is the Least of It, Says WaPo Column

In one line: A Washington Post column argues that AI assistants' constant intrusions are annoying — but the deeper issue is trust and control.

Key points

• The author describes everyday AI assistants as "deeply annoying" in practice.
• The central argument, however, is that the irritation masks a larger concern — intervention without clear consent, delegated judgment, and growing dependence.
• As an opinion piece, it appears to critique how AI assistants seep into daily life broadly, rather than targeting a single product.

Why it matters

As Big Tech makes AI assistants the default across operating systems, search, and productivity tools, this is a voice flagging the shift in control behind the "convenience." Designing for user trust is becoming as decisive as the feature race itself.

Read more

• Opinion | My AI assistant is deeply annoying — and that’s the least of it — The Washington Post